CorwinB said:
Actually, most games implementing cheat codes disable Achievements while you are using cheat codes. In case a game does allow you to use a cheat code and still gain Achievements, I don't think MS will start resetting GS for this reason, as the playing field is still even in that case. What MS are targetting right now seems to be :
- exploits using profile recovery on another console in order to boost gamerscore
- packet/save manipulation
Well, everyone interested in the competitive nature of Achievements gives a shit, I suppose. Frankly, those answers have been littering the thread, and are very counterproductive. If you don't care about Achievements and GS, no problem with that. But accept that there are people who care about that stuff, and found it hard to swallow that cheaters got a free pass on Live.
Gamerscores and friends list are part of the the social/competitive nature of Live, and are :
- one great differentiator for MS in the console race
- part of the reason why a good amount of Xbox players gobble up new software, giving the 360 its unheard of tie ratio, and keeping 3rd party devs on board
Actually, you have full control about what is on your personal console, and you can cheat all you want (including hacking Achievements) until the minute you connect it to Live. If you cheated to gain Achievements, feel slighted by the GS reset, I don't think MS will mind if you log out of Live and hack the content of your profile stocked on your Xbox to "restore" your GS. Locally on your console, that is.
Firstly, I misunderstood the policy at first, thinking that they were resetting achievements as a punishment for folks who cheated in online games.
I brought up cheat codes because I wanted to make the point that not everyone wants to playthe same game in the same way, and I think it's wrong for folks to step forward, and say its "not fair" that some one had an easier time at getting points because they played the game differently (I tendto play all of my games on the easiest difficulty level, because I like to get through them quicker; should I not get the "completion" achievements, since other folks playthroughonhard mode their first time?)
And I NEVER said that I don't care about Achievements, or think that they are stupid. I really enjoy collecting Achievements. What I think is stupid is the whole comparing yourself to other people aspect of it. It would be enough, IMO, to label folks as cheaters, so that other folks who care know not to compare themselves against them, but to remove achievements because other people care is essentially to FORCE folks into the whole dick-waving contest.
And as far as your defense of "they only erase your data if you go online" that is a bullshit answer. I am totally fine withthem choosing to block some one from going on line, but reaching in to their console and deleting data is NOT acceptable. Period. I'm running a PC thatI built myself right now, but my last machine was a Gateway. If Gateway decided to go into my PC anddelete some of my data, they would be ENTIRELY out of bounds. How is this any better.
FInally, I'm not sure if you were using ageneral or direct "you" above, butjust in case you were accusing me of having hacked some of my achievements (and apologies if you weren't)go ahead and check out my gamer score (The Evander). I think it's a respectable level, but if I was hackingachievements, don't you think it'd be higher? If you want to toss around accusations, you ought to have more to go on rather than just assuming "he doesn't like this policy, therefore he must have cheated." I'm against capital punishment too, but I've never commited a capital crime.