Skip to main content

Evaluation of Penetration Index of Untreated and Treated Soil Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 164))

  • 1039 Accesses

Abstract

Small-scale dynamic cone penetrometer is a rapid and less expensive tool extensively used for assessment of strength of soil layers to a limited depth of highway and airfield pavements. Penetrometer consists of a cone of 20 mm diameter with 60º apex angle driven into the soil by a hammer of weight 8 kg falling freely through a height of 575 mm, and tests are conducted by compacting soil in calibration cylinders of two different sizes. Tests are conducted on untreated, cement or lime treated clay of high compressibility and clayey sand mixed with 5–30% moisture content and compaction energy per unit volume of layer ranged from 0.5 to 6 kg/cm2. Penetration index of untreated and treated clay of high compressibility is varied from 5 to 42 mm/blow, and unconfined compressive strength is ranged from 101 to 233 kPa. Unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio and penetration index are presented in charts for different moisture content and degree of compaction. The average penetration index decreased with increase of lime or cement content and increase of curing period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashan AN (2014) Pavement performance monitoring using dynamic cone penetrometer and geogauge during construction. University of Texas, December (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas D (1965) Static penetration tests in london clay. Géotechnique 15(2):174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IS 6403- (1981) Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations

    Google Scholar 

  4. IS 8009 (Part 1) - (1976) Code of practice for calculation of settlements of shallow foundations

    Google Scholar 

  5. IS 2911 (Part 1/sec 1) – (1979) Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations

    Google Scholar 

  6. IS 8009 (Part II) – (1980) Code of practice for calculation of settlements of deep foundations

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amadi AA, Sadiku S, Abdullahi M, Danyaya HA (2018) Case study of construction quality control monitoring and strength evaluation of a lateritic pavement using the dynamic cone penetrometer. Int J Pavement Res Technol

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM D6951–03 (2003) Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ampadu S, Arthur T (2006) The dynamic cone penetrometer in compaction verification on a model road pavement. Geotech Test J 29(1):70–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kleyn EG (1975) The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP). Transvaal Roads Department, Report L2/74, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harison JA (1987) Correlation between california bearing ratio and dynamic cone penetrometer strength measurement of soils. Proc Institution Civil Eng Part 2 83:833–844

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee C, Kim KS, Woo W, Lee W (2014) Soil stiffness gauge (SSG) and dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests for estimating engineering properties of weathered sandy soils in Korea. Eng Geol 169:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabr MA, Hopkins K, Coonse J, Hearne T (2000) DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers. J Perform Constr Facil 14(4):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Livneh M (1987) Validation of correlations between a number of penetration tests and in situ California bearing ratio tests. Transportation Research Record 1219, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 56–67

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patel MA, Patel HS, Dadhich G (2013) Prediction of subgrade strength parameters from dynamic cone penetrometer index, modified liquid limit and moisture content. Procedia – Soc Behavioral Sciences 104:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun X, Han J, Crippen L, Corey R (2017) Back-calculation of resilient modulus and prediction of permanent deformation for fine-grained subgrade under cyclic loading. J Mater Civil Eng 29(5)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ampadu SIK, Fiadjoe GJY (2015) The influence of water content on the dynamic cone penetration index of a lateritic soil stabilized with various percentages of a quarry by-product. Transp Geotech 5:68–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Enayatpour S, Puppala AJ, Vasudevan H (2006) Dynamic cone penetrometer to evaluate unconfined compressive strength of stabilized soils. In: Site and geomaterial characterization - proceedings of the geoshanghai conference, 149th edn. pp 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  19. Houlsby GT, Hitchman R (1988) Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in sand. Géotechnique 38(1):39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pournaghiazar M, Russell AR, Khalili N (2012) Linking cone penetration resistances measured in calibration chambers and the field. Géotech Letters 2(2):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Butlanska J, Arroyo M, Gens A (2012) Virtual calibration chamber CPT on Ticino sand. In: 2nd International symposium on cone penetration testing, CPT'10, Huntington Beach, California, pp 217–224

    Google Scholar 

  22. Falagush O, McDowell GR, Yu HS (2015) Discrete element modeling of cone penetration tests incorporating particle shape and crushing. Int J Geomech 15(6):14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edil TB, Benson CH (2005) Investigation of the DCP and SSG as alternative methods to determine subgrade stability. SPR#0092-01-05. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison

    Google Scholar 

  24. Specifications for Road and bridge works (2013) Ministry of road and transport & highways, 5th edn. pp 66

    Google Scholar 

  25. Transport Research Laboratory 1993 A guide to the structural design of bitumen-surfaced roads in tropical and sub-tropical countries. TRL, Crowthorne, (Overseas Road Note 31)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar PVSNP (2005) Studies on Quick lime treated black cotton soils. Indian geotechnical conference - 2005, Ahmedabad, 227–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pratapa, V.S.N.P.K. (2022). Evaluation of Penetration Index of Untreated and Treated Soil Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. In: Tutumluer, E., Nazarian, S., Al-Qadi, I., Qamhia, I.I. (eds) Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 164. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77230-7_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77230-7_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77229-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77230-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics